Key Metrics of Yuki Realty Developers Private Limited
About Yuki Realty Developers Private Limited
Company details
Company summary
Entity details
Compliance
Industry classification
Financials, ratios and risk analysis
Revenue, EBITDA, net profit, net worth, debt and assets for every filing year, 15+ ratios, the financial health score, shareholding, charges and peer comparison are part of the premium plan.
Sign in to continue See plans & pricingFiling compliance
Due dates follow the Companies Act: AGM within six months of the year end, AOC-4 within 30 days and MGT-7 within 60 days of the AGM. A filing made but not yet uploaded here shows as pending.
Vendor checks & payment capacity
Sign in with access to company financials to review vendor evidence.
Credit ratings
Rating history
Rating actions
| Date | Agency | Action | Long term | Short term | Outlook | Rated amount | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Apr 2026 | ICRA | Assigned | BBB- | — | Stable | ₹150 Cr | View |
Credit strengths (ICRA, Apr 2026)
+ Established track record of Sponsor Group
The rating derives comfort from the group’s strong parentage through Rava Partners, the real estate arm of Singapore-based Hillhouse investments with an established track record in acquiring and managing warehousing spaces.
+ Favourable project location
The project is part of the Mannur micro-market and is located off National Highway 48 (NH-48) and State Highway 50B (SH-50B), which offer superior connectivity through the Peripheral Ring Road and the upcoming National Expressway 7 (NE-7).
+ Low funding risk
The budgeted cost of the project stands at Rs. 418.5 crore, which is estimated to be funded by a debt-to- equity ratio of 60:40.
Credit challenges
− Exposure to project execution and market risks
The ratings are constrained by the project’s exposure with only 24% of the budgeted cost incurred as of December 2025.
− High project leverage and refinancing risk
The leverage measured by Debt/NOI is expected to behigh as of March 2031.
Could lead to an upgrade
ICRA could upgrade the ratings if the company achieves significant progress in leasing at adequate rental rates, along with timely completion of project without any major cost overruns and mitigation of refinancing risk associated with the CF loan.
Could lead to a downgrade
Cost overrun or unforeseen delay in completing the project could exert pressure on the company’s ratings. Considerable delays in lease tie-up at adequate rental rates impacting its refinancing ability or any significant increase in indebtedness impacting the debt protection metrics may also warrant a rating downgrade .
Agency-reported financials (ICRA, 29 Apr 2026)
| Metric | FY2025 | 9MFY2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating income | — | — |
| PAT | ₹-0.10 Cr | ₹-0.80 Cr |
| OPBDIT/OI | — | — |
| PAT/OI | — | — |
| Total outside liabilities/Tangible net worth (times) | 0.00× | -81.80× |
| Total debt/OPBDIT (times) | — | -47.70× |
| Interest coverage (times) | -289.00× | -364.20× |
| EBITDA (margin × income) | — | — |
| Implied total debt (debt/EBITDA × EBITDA) | — | — |
| Implied interest cost (EBITDA ÷ coverage) | — | — |
Borrowings & rated debt
Facility mix
Rated facilities
| Facility | Type | Previous | Current | Change | Rating | Action | Agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term fund-based – Term loan | Term loans | — | ₹150 Cr | — | BBB- (Stable) | Assigned | ICRA |
Credit assessment · Manufacturing
Rating Methodology – Manufacturing Companies (Mar 2025) · Standalone accounts · FY 2024-25
Ratios, pillar scores and the indicative rating are part of Premium.
Rating status
| Default | No default on record |
| Issuer cooperation | Cooperating |
| Credit enhancement | None – standalone rating |
| Next action stable or better (model) | 48% |
| Information on file | 33% · missing: Audited financial statements (last 18 months), Annual results history (3+ years), Liquidity position, Debt obligations and repayment schedule, Auditor details, Shareholding pattern |
Indicative assessment from public data using the published methodology factors; not a credit rating.
Borrowing & funding lifecycle
- Credit outlook model: 48% chance the next rating action is stable or better
- Current rating BBB- (investment grade)
- Interest coverage -364.2×
What happened, step by step
- Apr 2026 — Project / plant of ₹318.3 cr
- Apr 2026 — Term debt tied up (₹150 cr)
“These, along with the committed equity, security deposits and internal accruals, are expected to be adequate to fund the pending project cost of Rs. 318.3 crore as on December 31, 2025.”
Rated limits by facility
Timeline
From the report
The construction finance (CF) loan of Rs. 150 crore availed in YRDPL and Rs. 100 crore availed in YWPL for the project has a bullet repayment obligation falling due in FY2031, indicating the refinancing risk.
From the report
These, along with the committed equity, security deposits and internal accruals, are expected to be adequate to fund the pending project cost of Rs. 318.3 crore as on December 31, 2025.
Lender names, bank charges and audited borrowings are part of Premium.
Built from MCA charges, ICRA/CARE rating reports and audited accounts. The borrowing view is an estimate, not a lender's credit decision.
Registered office and contact
Directors and key people
Directors are read from the MGT-7 annual return and AOC-4 signatories.
Charges (secured borrowings)
0 registered charges. Lenders, amounts and dates are part of the premium plan.
Statutory auditors
Auditors are read from the AOC-4 auditor's report section.
Business activities and related parties
Principal business activities and related-party transactions are read from MGT-7 and AOC-4 filings.
Filings
No filings on record yet.