Key Metrics of Azure Power
About Azure Power
Sectors
Company details
- Website
- azurepower.com
Operational Areas of Azure Power
Company summary
Entity details
Compliance
Industry classification
Financials, ratios and risk analysis
Revenue, EBITDA, net profit, net worth, debt and assets for every filing year, 15+ ratios, the financial health score, shareholding, charges and peer comparison are part of the premium plan.
Sign in to continue See plans & pricingFiling compliance
Due dates follow the Companies Act: AGM within six months of the year end, AOC-4 within 30 days and MGT-7 within 60 days of the AGM. A filing made but not yet uploaded here shows as pending.
Vendor checks & payment capacity
Sign in with access to company financials to review vendor evidence.
Credit ratings
Rating history
Rating actions
| Date | Agency | Action | Long term | Short term | Outlook | Rated amount | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06 Oct 2026 | CARE | Reaffirmed | AA- | — | Stable | ₹17.9 Cr | View |
| 27 May 2026 | ICRA | Withdrawn | A | — | Stable | ₹31.0 Cr | View |
| 11 Mar 2026 | CARE | Other | AA- | — | Stable | ₹21.0 Cr | View |
| 22 Dec 2025 | CARE | Assigned | AA- | — | Stable | ₹21.0 Cr | View |
Credit strengths (CARE, Oct 2026)
+ Presence of inter-company agreement for pooling of surplus cash flows and comfortable debt coverage metrics
The 14 special purpose vehicles (SPVs) of the Azure Group have formed an RG, where these entities have entered an inter- company co-obligor agreement, under which each entity is jointly and severally liable for servicing the combined debt obligations. The co-obligor agreement is unconditional and irrevocable, valid for the full tenor of the rated debt facilities and characterised by the presence of a T-minus structure and cross-default clause among the 14 entities. Each entity is required to tra
+ Revenue visibility considering long-term PPAs for majority capacity
CareEdge Ratings considers presence of long-term PPAs for the entire capacity under the RG pool with a weighted average tariff of ₹6.05 per unit, providing healthy revenue visibility, however, cost-competitiveness remains moderate. Around 36% of the portfolio is tied up with stronger counterparties, such as Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI), Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL), and NTPC Limited, and the balance is held by state discoms, such as Southern Power Distribution Company of
+ Long operational track record with satisfactory generation performance
The generation profile of the pool remained satisfactory, as reflected by actual generation remaining in line with designed energy estimates, as reflected by PLF of 17.1% (AC) in FY26 compared to FY25 PLF of 17.5%. The lower PLF in FY26 was primarily attributable to lower solar irradiance levels during the year. Generation was also impacted by certain asset -specific operational issues, including inverter outages/failures and DC power cable failure at AUPL and APPPL, which together account for n
+ Diversified asset portfolio in terms of geography, and counterparty
The entire solar capacity of 599 MWAC under RG is distributed across 14 SPVs. The asset pool is geographically diversified wi th projects across seven states, including Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Karnataka, Punjab, Rajasthan, and Telangana. Counterparty credit profile is diversified with exposure to central (~36%) and state (~64%) counterparties. Around 36% portfolio is tied up with stronger counterparties, such as SECI, GUVNL, and NTPC , having low credit risk and an established track reco
+ Assets being part of the Azure Group, having long operating track record in renewable energy segment
The entities under the RG are wholly owned subsidiaries of APIPL, which is a subsidiary of Azure Power Global Limited (APGL). The group develops and operates renewable power capacity and has experience of over 10 years in this segment. APGL’s shareholders include Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec (CDPQ), which holds 53.4%, followed by Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS), which holds 21.4%, and the balance is owned by multiple financial investors , such as
Credit challenges
− Leveraged capital structure for RG with exposure to interest rate risks
The RG’s capital structure is leveraged, as reflected in total external debt/EBITDA of ~5.9x at FY26-end. Going forward, per CareEdge Ratings’ base case, the capital structure is expected to remainleveraged, with total debt/ EBITDA expected to remain range bound between 4.5x and 5.5x over the next few years. Consequently, the company remains exposed to interest rate variations, as the debt is linked to floating rates.
− Moderate financial risk profile of off-takers
The RG is exposed to counterparty-related risks, as ~64% of the portfolio capacity is contracted with state discoms, having weak to moderate credit profiles. Current receivable cycle remains comfortable as payments are being cleared within 60-90 days of raising an invoice for almost off-takers and clearance of past dues. CareEdge Ratings expects the collection cycle to remain rangebound within 60-90 days for regular billing, and significant deterioration will be a key credit monitorable.
− Vulnerability of cash flows to variation in weather conditions
As tariffs are single part in nature, the company may report lower revenue if power generation declines due to variation in weather conditions or equipment quality. This would affect its cash flows and ability to service debt.
Could lead to an upgrade
• Achievement of generation levels better than envisaged levels per CareEdge Ratings’ base case on a sustained basis, positively impacting debt coverage indicators. • Faster-than-expected deleveraging of the portfolio.
Could lead to a downgrade
• Significant deterioration in the generation profile or increase in cost of debt on a sustained basis, leading to moderation of DSCR below 1.20x. • Elongation in receivable cycle beyond 120 days on a sustained basis.
Agency-reported financials (CARE, 06 Oct 2026)
| Metric | March 31, 2025 | March 31, 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| Total Operating Income | ₹548 Cr | ₹540 Cr |
| PBILDT | ₹438 Cr | ₹454 Cr |
| PAT | ₹387 Cr | ₹44.50 Cr |
| Overall Gearing (times) | 1.40× | 1.70× |
| Interest Coverage (times) | 1.70× | 1.50× |
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | −1.4% |
| EBITDA margin | 80.0% | 84.1% |
| Implied interest cost (EBITDA ÷ coverage) | ₹258 Cr | ₹303 Cr |
| PAT margin | 70.6% | 8.2% |
Borrowings & rated debt
Rated limits over time
Facility mix
Rated facilities
| Facility | Type | Previous | Current | Change | Rating | Action | Agency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-term bank facilities | Working capital & bank lines | — | ₹17.9 Cr | — | AA- (Stable) | Reaffirmed | CARE |
CARE ratings on record (checked 29 Oct 2026)
| Instrument | Amount | Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Rating in the absence of the pending steps/documents | — | Withdrawn |
| Term Loan | ₹17.9 Cr | CARE AA-; Stable |
Lenders
| Fund-based - LT | Term Loan | REC Ltd. |
Credit assessment · Manufacturing
Rating Methodology – Manufacturing Companies (Mar 2025) · Standalone accounts · FY 2025-26
Ratios, pillar scores and the indicative rating are part of Premium.
Rating status
| Default | No default on record |
| Issuer cooperation | Cooperating |
| Credit enhancement | None – standalone rating |
| Withdrawal | ICRA · 27 May 2026 · Withdrawn at company request with lender NOCs |
| Next action stable or better (model) | 53% |
| Information on file | 56% · missing: Debt obligations and repayment schedule, Capex / investment plans, Auditor details, Shareholding pattern |
Indicative assessment from public data using the published methodology factors; not a credit rating.
Borrowing & funding lifecycle
- Credit outlook model: 56% chance the next rating action is stable or better
- Current rating AA- (investment grade)
- Interest coverage 1.5×
Rated limits by facility
Timeline
From the report
Around 36% of the portfolio is tied up with stronger counterparties, such as Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI), Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL), and NTPC Limited, and the balance is held by state discoms, such as Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited (SPDCAPL), Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM), and Hubli Electricity Supply Company Limited (HESCOM) among others.
From the report
Liquidity: Adequate As of August 2026 end, on a combined basis, the liquidity position of the pool is adequate, as reflected by total free cash and bank balance of ~₹353.5 crore, with a restricted cash balance of ~₹138.2 crore, equivalent to one quarter of debt servicing obligations per the stipulated terms.
From the report
Moreover, ~36% of the portfolio is tied up with stronger counterparties such as Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI), Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) and NTPC Limited, and the balance is held by state discoms such as Southern Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited (SPDCAPL), Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM), and Hubli Electricity Supply Company Limited (HESCOM) among others.
From the report
Liquidity: Adequate As of October 2025-end, on a combined basis, the RG’s liquidity position is adequate, as reflected by total free cash and bank balance of ~₹421.1 crore, with a restricted cash balance of ~₹0.5 crore in the form of bank guarantee (BG) margin.
From the report
Moreover, ~36% of the portfolio is tied up with stronger counterparties such as Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI), Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited (GUVNL) and NTPC Limited, and the balance is held by state discoms such as Southern Power Distributi on Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited (SPDCAPL), Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited (BESCOM) and Hubli Electricity Supply Company Limited (HESCOM) among others.
From the report
Liquidity: Adequate As on October 2025-end, on a combined basis, the RG’s liquidity position is adequate, as reflected by total free cash and bank balance of ~₹421.1 crore, with a restricted cash balance of ~₹0.5 crore in the form of BG margin.
Lender names, bank charges and audited borrowings are part of Premium.
Built from MCA charges, ICRA/CARE rating reports and audited accounts. The borrowing view is an estimate, not a lender's credit decision.
Registered office and contact
Directors and key people
Directors are read from the MGT-7 annual return and AOC-4 signatories.
Competitors of Azure Power
Top competitors by location
| Company | Description | Domain | Founded | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NTPC Limited |
Power Generation & Utilities · Oil, Gas & Energy | ntpc.co.in | 1975 | New Delhi, India |
Adani Green Energy Limited |
Renewable Power · Electricity, Gas and Water companies | adanigreenenergy.com | 2015 | Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India |
JSW Energy |
Renewable Power · Oil, Gas & Energy | jsw.in/energy | — | Mumbai, India |
| Renewable Power · Oil, Gas & Energy | seci.co.in | — | India | |
Suzlon Energy |
Part of Suzlon Group. | suzlon.com | 1995 | Ahmedabad, India |
| Renewable Power · Oil, Gas & Energy | tatapowerrenewables.com | — | Mumbai, India | |
| Sterling And Wilson Renewable Energy Limited | Renewable Power · Oil, Gas & Energy | — | — | Mumbai, Maharashtra, India |
| Saatvik Green Energy Limited | · Electricity, Gas and Water companies | — | — | Haryana, India |
SJVN |
Renewable Power · Oil, Gas & Energy | sjvn.nic.in | — | Shimla, India |
Inox Wind |
Discovered Companies · Other Industries | inoxwind.com | 2009 | Una, India |
Similar companies
Charges (secured borrowings)
0 registered charges. Lenders, amounts and dates are part of the premium plan.
Statutory auditors
Auditors are read from the AOC-4 auditor's report section.
Business activities and related parties
Solar power
Filings
No filings on record yet.







